It Deserves Repeating Why we shouldn't build the Coal Plant
Hutch
4 Comments
1 Reference
I don't want to get into too big of a habit of repeating myself, but this is important to think about. On the topic of the Coal Plant, what other entities are there supporting it? Well... not the Chamber of Commerce. At least according to their own publications they shouldn't. I copied this straight out of the Great Falls Chamber of Commerce' "Strategic Plan for Economic Development in Great Falls."
"PRINCIPLE #7: Tapping the potential of its alternative energy resources can set Great Falls apart as a business location offering a unique infrastructure and enticing opportunities in an energy dependent global economy. Our location on the Missouri River and our climate afford opportunities for substantial business development in the fields of alternative energy generation and distribution. Reliable energy sources and stable pricing are crucial to many businesses that would consider relocating to Great Falls. If some of the energy that is produced locally could be earmarked for new industry, Great Falls could gain a significant advantage in recruiting new industry and producing basic sector jobs. Part of the equation of energy supplies and pricing is alternative forms of energy such as wind and fuel cells. Those energy sources could also be promoted and developed in this area for their economic development benefits."
References (1)
-
Response: missouri real estateLooking for missouri real estate.
Reader Comments (4)
Hutch,
Ya gotta explain this to me in little words...why shouldn't Great Falls get the Coal to Liquid plant, which (I thought, anyway) was considered a green energy. I thought part of the bill would be paid by the AF, too -- or was that not part of the plan?
The Coal to Liquids plant is separate from the Highwood coal-fired power plant. The CTL plant is considered a green energy idea. And yes, I think it is a good idea. And the exerpt here from the CoC would support that. But the CFPP is not a green energy idea... it's just a power plant using coal. I know it's supposed to be the cleanest coal plant in the country. But isn't that a bit like being the richest vagrant? or the best-dressed flood victim?
That makes a little more sense now. I was just confused why you were opposed to the CTL plant because that one seems like it would be a really good addition to GF.
I would agree that a CFPP is a bad idea. We should be passed technologies like that.
Acknowledging that the plant is bad is easy. The problem now is that we are past the point of no return. I think Great Falls has enough money invested in the thing to make it really hurt if we don't go through with it. I'm still reasearching it, and I bet Geeguy over at the Electric City Weblog will know more, but I think G.F. is liable for several million dollars if the plant isn't built.